- Compliance Career Feature
The Missing Piece in the Restatement Puzzle
by Jeffrey Thomson, Institute of Management Accountants (IMA)
by Jeffrey Thomson, Institute of Management Accountants (IMA)
Financial restatements continue to be a major concern and focus of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Treasury, Congress, and other federal agencies. The reasons for this are understandable. Restatements have a profound impact on investor protections and on a firm's cost of capital, ability to grow shareholder wealth, and overall effect on U.S. global competitiveness. While there clearly is an overarching mission among the various committees focused on the financial restatement problem, there is a ''missing piece'' to fully addressing the root causes of financial restatement errors in the U.S. and around the globe: a lack of Generally Accepted Control Assessment Standards (GACAS).
To help close this gap, the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA®) recently launched its new Finance GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) Research Practice area with the release of a provocative research discussion paper titled Accounting Control Assessment Standards: The Missing Piece in the Restatement Puzzle (http://www.imanet.org/pdf/FGRC_02.05.FINAL.pdf). This discussion paper draws on more than three years of research, Congressional testimony, and thought-leader pieces in the areas of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) implementation, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), and related issues in internal controls and compliance.
Supported by prior research and an assessment of 25 large Accelerated Filers, the research suggests that the lack of focus on and accountability for tracking and reducing ''error rates'' may be a more significant root cause of material financial restatements than the complexity of accounting standards and regulations. Error rates are defined as cases where management and their external auditors attest that they have an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting, but subsequently issue a material financial restatement that can be related back to a breakdown in internal controls.
While the discussion paper is primarily intended to provoke discussion, debate, and, most importantly, more comprehensive and global research to tackle and solve this critical problem, it offers several options and solutions to consider. One solution is assigning accountability to a properly funded private organization to develop GACAS capable of identifying and reducing the incidence of material errors in financial statements over the long term, which would require systemic and detailed analysis of the root cause(s) of errors. Perhaps this organization would be called the ''Center for Financial Reporting Quality,'' focused on error reduction and process improvement throughout the end-to-end financial reporting supply chain. Furthermore, requiring analysis of audit opinion errors, enacting appropriate safe harbors for issuers and auditors to enable disclosures of root cause error analysis, greater understanding and emphasis on technology (such as XBRL) to detect and prevent material errors, and implementing globally accepted risk and quality frameworks are also suggested.
The paper also provides a candid hypothesis as to why companies ''get it wrong'' and produce materially wrong financial statements at a rate in excess of one in every 10 Accelerated Filers (financial restatements as a percentage of total filers) in 2006. These hypotheses include a lack of fact-based, statistical information among the root causes of materially incorrect management- and auditor-certified financial statements. There is also reluctance to tackle the tough, ''indelicate'' risks head-on, with too much money and time spent on low-risk areas. A lack of emphasis on technology and a single organization focused on and accountable for identifying and reducing the frequency of material errors also is at issue.
To help address these critical problem areas, FGRC integrates three bodies of knowledge that have become critical for CFOs around the world to drive business performance inside their organizations: governance, which is the set of accountabilities and alignment of responsibilities in an organization; risk management, including ERM; and compliance, the system of internal controls and processes to satisfy regulatory, industry, and organizational requirements.
The critical work performed by management accountants and finance professionals across the financial and information supply chain directly affects the quality of internal controls, financial reporting, and ultimately, a clean audit outcome. To date, there has been a lack of research, guidance, training, and certification directed to these professionals who comprise more than 90 percent of all finance function professionals in the U.S. and around the world. IMA launched the FGRC practice to address this market need.
The focus on educating management accountants and organizations to produce accurate, reliable, and relevant financial information for an organization’s stakeholders using risk, performance, and quality assessment techniques across the supply chain is essential to curbing the amount of restatement errors.
This research is a first step to shedding light on these issues, while addressing the internal gap in best practices, guidance, training, and certification so that high quality financial information can be delivered to investors around the globe. Nothing less than investor protections, a firm’s cost of capital and value creating potential, and U.S. global competitiveness are at stake.
![]() | |
| + Enlarge | |
| Jeff Thompson |
Supported by prior research and an assessment of 25 large Accelerated Filers, the research suggests that the lack of focus on and accountability for tracking and reducing ''error rates'' may be a more significant root cause of material financial restatements than the complexity of accounting standards and regulations. Error rates are defined as cases where management and their external auditors attest that they have an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting, but subsequently issue a material financial restatement that can be related back to a breakdown in internal controls.
While the discussion paper is primarily intended to provoke discussion, debate, and, most importantly, more comprehensive and global research to tackle and solve this critical problem, it offers several options and solutions to consider. One solution is assigning accountability to a properly funded private organization to develop GACAS capable of identifying and reducing the incidence of material errors in financial statements over the long term, which would require systemic and detailed analysis of the root cause(s) of errors. Perhaps this organization would be called the ''Center for Financial Reporting Quality,'' focused on error reduction and process improvement throughout the end-to-end financial reporting supply chain. Furthermore, requiring analysis of audit opinion errors, enacting appropriate safe harbors for issuers and auditors to enable disclosures of root cause error analysis, greater understanding and emphasis on technology (such as XBRL) to detect and prevent material errors, and implementing globally accepted risk and quality frameworks are also suggested.
The paper also provides a candid hypothesis as to why companies ''get it wrong'' and produce materially wrong financial statements at a rate in excess of one in every 10 Accelerated Filers (financial restatements as a percentage of total filers) in 2006. These hypotheses include a lack of fact-based, statistical information among the root causes of materially incorrect management- and auditor-certified financial statements. There is also reluctance to tackle the tough, ''indelicate'' risks head-on, with too much money and time spent on low-risk areas. A lack of emphasis on technology and a single organization focused on and accountable for identifying and reducing the frequency of material errors also is at issue.
To help address these critical problem areas, FGRC integrates three bodies of knowledge that have become critical for CFOs around the world to drive business performance inside their organizations: governance, which is the set of accountabilities and alignment of responsibilities in an organization; risk management, including ERM; and compliance, the system of internal controls and processes to satisfy regulatory, industry, and organizational requirements.
The critical work performed by management accountants and finance professionals across the financial and information supply chain directly affects the quality of internal controls, financial reporting, and ultimately, a clean audit outcome. To date, there has been a lack of research, guidance, training, and certification directed to these professionals who comprise more than 90 percent of all finance function professionals in the U.S. and around the world. IMA launched the FGRC practice to address this market need.
The focus on educating management accountants and organizations to produce accurate, reliable, and relevant financial information for an organization’s stakeholders using risk, performance, and quality assessment techniques across the supply chain is essential to curbing the amount of restatement errors.
This research is a first step to shedding light on these issues, while addressing the internal gap in best practices, guidance, training, and certification so that high quality financial information can be delivered to investors around the globe. Nothing less than investor protections, a firm’s cost of capital and value creating potential, and U.S. global competitiveness are at stake.
|
Comments
article ID: 700043 http://www.compliancecrossing.com/article/700043/The-Missing-Piece-in-the-Restatement-Puzzle/ article title: The Missing Piece in the Restatement Puzzle |
||
| Comment not found for this article. | ||
|
|
||
|
Related articles
|
|
Facebook comments: |
| Bring Order and Structure to Your Compliance Job Search |
|
In an orderly and structured fashion, we consolidate all of the compliance jobs from every professional firm career page, company and organization career page (and every other job site we can find) so you know about all the compliance jobs and can make your important personal career decisions in an objective and rational way. We are a "good citizen" in the compliance community and have high research standards and know you too have high standards for your career. As an unbiased research company with a profound respect for concrete facts and information about job openings, we are loyal to our members and do not accept any money from advertisers for job postings. We give you the tools to follow through and pursue your career options in a stable, practical and down-to-earth manner. |
|
Tell us where to send your access instructions:
|
|
total jobs on EmploymentCrossing |
| 3,498,334 |
|
new jobs this week on EmploymentCrossing |
| 627,000 |
| Get your risk FREE trial |
| jobs near you | |
|
International jobs Work at home jobs |
UK jobs Canada jobs |
|
New search feature using US map. click here
Looking for a new compliance job in your city? click here |
|
| most recent articles |
| Do What You Want to Do, Not What You Think You Should Do |
|
I know two men who worked in New York City, each of whom made millions of dollars and immediately quit their jobs, taking up completely different careers as gas station owners in New Jersey. I learned about one of these men when I was in college, and I heard about the other man several years later, when I was a recruiter. For the past several years, I have puzzled over the stories of these t... |
|
compliance industry news:
|
|
recent articles:
|
|
|
| top 5 job searches |
| today's featured job |
|
Manager, TAS Compliance
United States-MA-Watertown Bright Horizons is growing! If you are enthusiastic, flexible, innovative, fun, and dedicated to an “out-of-this-world” customer experience, we... |
|
|||||||||
| Free Report
The Five "Big Dirty Secrets" of Job Sites Just enter your email to get the Report |
![]() |
|||
![]() |







